KUMARIK CONTINENT

Many a book has been written under the name kumari Continent anchored in the notes of Iraiyanar Ahapporul (A Tamizh Literary work), and the quotes from Silappadhiharam, the oldest Thamizh (Tamil) epic existing. The imprint truth was persistently rephrased since there were no other reliable sources available for the historians on ‘Kumari Continent’. It was on track well with Deva Neya Paavanar, the first Thamizh linguist, who approached Kumari Continent in an unusual loom.

All Thamizh scholars and historians were fastened to the equivalent point with similar approach, staying away from the thought of the Kumari Continent, stating that it was an imaginary story which had never existed. They were reprimand that the Thamizh scholars had been upraising themselves under the name the Kumari continent.

Paavanar had found the right path to mark the history of the Tamil people or the Thamizh world with the exact view point. He sent his research paper to Madras University for the doctorate which was rejected by the university’s ostensible academicians who had no fundamental clutch of having handles on what had been said by Paavanar. They pointed out that the research was deficient in crucial substantiation. It was a scorn for the Thamizh world that a great Thamizh scholar was completely disregarded and thrown out devoid of bountiful right esteem.

Paavanar’s research was not only discarded by the Thamizh scholars of the university but also was poked fun at his research and the person as well. In the present day, the same research, the proven thinking, The Kumari Continent, is being acknowledged by the whole world with evidences. It is not far-off to proclaim the world that Thamizh was the first language and the Thamizh people were the first people evolved on the earth, for which, the substantiations reaching are promising.

There were numerous ideological clashes on the mother land of the Thamizh people either they were the people of the Kumari Continent or the invaders like the Arians who came to India. To expose to the world the counterfeit ideology that ‘The Thamizh people were not the people of the Kumarik Continent, the Arians tried to spread number of stories. Some said that the Thamizh people were not from Kumari Continent or India. But the Arians were trying to prove that they were the ancient race of India. Others said that the Tamil people came to India through cyber passage way (Himalayas) and fought against the Arians who were in the Indus region. And they insisted that the Tamil people were driven away to the South by the Arians which is a counterfeit.

The Europeans came to India by the landing of Vasco-da-Gama in 1498. The British invaded India through the East Indian Companies. Some came with the purpose of commerce and others for spreading Christianity. To spread Christianity and to maintain business, the British and the Europeans started learning Thamizh. Some got absorbed in to the richness of Thamizh. In the long progression of learning, they mastered it finding innumerable European words rooted in Thamizh. Thamizh terms were commonly known mostly in Sitik (Solomon Islands), Turanian, Babylonian languages. Professors Julian Wilson thought that the Thamizh people came to India from Scandinavian nations (Norway, Sweden and Denmark region including Finland and Iceland). Prof. C. F. Gower too accepted Prof. Wilson’s notion that is erroneous.

Some of the affluent Thamizh letters like Zha, Gna Gha were found in Mongolian language which made Prof. Fergusson, William Hunter, Marshan decide that the Thamizh people came to India from Magnolia. Dr. Ophet and many more professors discovered that there were many things interweaved relationship between Sumerian and Thamizh in language, race religion, legends and stories,

Dr. Nicholas Lehovari came to a conclusion that the language and the culture of the people who started the civilization of Babylon were none other than the Thamizh or the commonly known word ‘Dravidians.’

‘Thamizh people were not from the Thamizh land. For the code of conduct between the South African tribes and the Australian tribes look similar, which is also found in Thamizh Nadu. Hence, ‘Thamizh people belong to the black origin’, explained Crools and Morris which is also a false declaration.

Dr. Slater, James Hornel and many more scholars have stated that Thamizh people were from the Greek origin as same as the burial style of Thamizh people and the Mediterranean countries (Cyprus, Greece, Anatolia and many more is similar. Thus, they drew a finale that the Thamizh people’s origin lay in the Greek.

From all the fore said scholars’ information, one could easily conclude that the civilization of the Thamizh people was found in more than fifty countries of the world. And more than fifty languages of the world have Thamizh as the root word. This is the substantiation to promulgate that Thamizh is the universal language and the first language ever spoken on the earth.

Dr. Hekel came out with a startling theory as: ‘Kumari Continent is nothing but the land submerged in the Indian Ocean where the origin of the first living being and the human being evolved. Thamizh people were not the people who came down to this land from some other land rather their mother land is Kumari continent.’ It was P. V. Manikka Nayakkar the first Thamizh person, who seconded Dr. Hekel followed by V. R Ramachchandira Theetchidhar, wrote in his book ‘Origin and spread of the Thamizhs,’ insisting the theory of Dr. Hekel.  

‘We, therefore, conclude that the so called Mediterranean race had its origin in the peninsular India. It was a home for the Dravidian origin which was found in the submerged continent. It was connected to south India and with Africa, when the indo Gangetic basin had not probably been formed. So, the Dravidian element has not been found in Indian culture alone, but largely traceable in Cretan, Aegean, Sumerian, Babylonian, Hebrew, Egyptian, Phoenician and other cultures of the ancient world.’

The foresaid explications were mentioned a few centuries ago. Kumari Continent theory was submerged by the Arian and the dominant rulers just as the Lemorian Continent. But now, the cat is out of the basket. The historical view, the archaeological aspects and linguistic researches prove the truth. And this book tries to explain with a neo feature on Kumari Continent.